So it’s statistically demonstrable that miracles happen to people who believe in God, but not to atheists, right?

If it isn’t even possible to prove the existence of real miracles, then how can God’s existence be proven?

It would be a miracle if no “miraculous” healings occurred. The question is: Is it possible for more such events to happen within a single control group (i.e., a group that serves as a baseline for comparison)?

Atheists don’t think that miracles are impossible; we simply await conclusive evidence that miracles do actually exist.

Don’t even the callers believe in those miracles anymore?

Have you returned to your faith? Do the priests’ teachings make no sense to you?

If those charismatic Christians truly had the ability to perform miracles and heal people, that would prove their supernatural nature.

Atheism, in its essence, represents a scientific stance. Science could potentially demonstrate the existence of the soul, the impact of prayers, and the possibility of miracles, if such things did indeed exist.

It would be nice if we could just provide a scientific proof that this method (or “ima”) actually works.

Not a single miracle has yet been scientifically proven.

Kövér László: When it comes to the future, we must believe in the eternal truth of the individual.