Science has not discovered any soul that is independent of matter or that exists outside of the natural world; we are advanced animals.

Does any such realization—no matter how modest or superficial—it contribute to our understanding of the fact that we are not made of matter, but rather possess a spirit that transcends nature?

Haha… If science still can’t explain consciousness itself, then what on earth can?

Do Christians who believe in the existence of a spiritual soul that is separate from the natural world represent an ignorant viewpoint?

It wasn’t until then that people were considered to be something more than just a living creature—because they think, have a soul, and possess beliefs. (We don’t have a soul, and atheists don’t have any beliefs at all.)

Psychological research proves that animals don’t have souls, and therefore their existence ends there. But humans don’t have souls either.

From this, God will not yet be created. The ordinary, everyday person can be led to countless misconceptions and superstitions.

Science does not claim to discover the truth. Therefore, there isn’t much point in dedicating one’s life to anyone or anything.

The breath of God moves living creatures; shouldn’t physics and biology be allowed to exist as well?

Have miracles that violate the laws of physics been documented? Can the effect of prayer be demonstrated? Has the existence of supernatural beings been proven?

He was a believer in the existence of a natural God; atheism was something entirely new to him.