Modern science operates on assumptions borrowed from Christian worldview; even atheists acknowledge this.

The debate between faith and science in the age of the Enlightenment

Atheism becomes the only viewpoint that can be embraced with true intellectual wisdom.

If knowledge stands in opposition to faith, then knowledge must be right.

Of course, if someone claims to have seen someone walking through a wall, then no one will think it’s a hallucination.

What is the difference between what is “true” in the absolute sense, and what is considered true by certain people?

Not even accidentally would you want to undermine or question the validity of science.

This is what a Christian believes: that science can explain certain things even in the absence of your imaginary “friends” (i.e., supernatural entities).

Hamis is a postmodern figure; his worldview is shaped by atheism and scientism.

This science better unravels the mysteries of the universe; otherwise, no one will ever understand anything for sure.

Representatives of this field of knowledge relate themselves to the material world and claim that the existence of faith and gods can be seriously questioned.