Since we currently do not know the ultimate physical theory, we simply do not have any concept of whether physical constants could be different in some other context.

Until we understand the theory behind everything, our concept of “nature’s constants” remains meaningless; we don’t have any way of knowing with any certainty how likely these constants are to assume a particular value.

To be honest, no one really cares about how likely or unlikely it is that the universe will be “fine-tuned” (i.e., arranged in such a way as to allow life to exist).

It would be too simplistic to claim that God established the laws of nature.

We don’t even need to assume that a certain scenario exists in order to accept the concept of a multiverse.

If science can explain the phenomenon of “fine-tuning” (the way the universe seems to have been precisely adjusted for human life), will there still be any contradiction between faith and science?

He gave estimates in the order of 10^10^123, rather than just 10^123, but to my great disappointment, the likelihood of the physical world coming into existence was not considered at all.

From the blog post: “The cosmological constants would not, when analyzed in detail, fall within the natural range of their possible values; that range is between 10^53 and 10^120.”

Horváth Dezső: The theory of robbery has so far been supported by all observations made to date.

A multiverse could be something that has existed since eternity, consisting of an infinite number of universes that came into existence in the past.

So Yahweh is responsible for enforcing the laws of the Universe he created? That means there are no miracles, but only technology that has developed to a sufficient degree?